Cuban vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Cuban
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Cubans
Chickasaw
44.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,312,568 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 44.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 4.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 21.3% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 68.4% |
| Range | 46.6% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 44.1% | 48.9% |
| Median | 44.8% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.4% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.9% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Seminole (44.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Alaskan Athabascan (44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (44.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Iroquois (44.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |