Creek vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Creek
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Creek
Chickasaw
46.0%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,480,718 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.492 and weighted average of 46.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 1.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 19.4% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 64.2% | 68.4% |
| Range | 44.8% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 45.4% | 48.9% |
| Median | 47.1% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.8% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.9% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Creek by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Malaysian (45.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (46.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Albania (45.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Colombia (46.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (46.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 25.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 46.2% |
| South Americans | 23.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 46.1% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 46.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 46.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 21.7 /100 | #197 | Fair 46.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 21.0 /100 | #198 | Fair 46.1% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 46.0% |
| Creek | 17.2 /100 | #200 | Poor 46.0% |
| Malaysians | 15.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 14.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.9% |
| Taiwanese | 11.7 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 11.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.8% |
| South American Indians | 11.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 45.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 11.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 45.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 10.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 45.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |