Australian vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Australian
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Australians
Chickasaw
47.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,121,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 47.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 24.4% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 71.6% | 68.4% |
| Range | 47.2% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 52.1% | 48.9% |
| Median | 51.2% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.1% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.6% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Australians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Philippines (47.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Puget Sound Salish (47.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (47.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Indonesia (47.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (47.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 90.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| South Africans | 90.5 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Palestinians | 90.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Australians | 90.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Syrians | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 88.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |