Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chickasaw Currently Married

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,554,570 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.680 and weighted average of 44.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 4.7%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Ethiopia	Chickasaw
Minimum	30.1%	27.5%
Maximum	89.5%	68.4%
Range	59.4%	40.9%
Mean	47.4%	48.9%
Median	45.3%	49.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	43.2%	45.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	48.3%	54.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.0%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.3%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.2%	7.4%

Similar Demographics by Currently Married

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Currently Married

In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Cambodia (44.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (44.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (44.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (44.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Mexican American Indian (44.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Currently Married
Cubans	0.9 /100 \| #236	Tragic 44.6%
Seminole	0.9 /100 \| #237	Tragic 44.6%
Moroccans	0.9 /100 \| #238	Tragic 44.6%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 44.5%
Mexican American Indians	0.7 /100 \| #240	Tragic 44.5%
Ethiopians	0.7 /100 \| #241	Tragic 44.5%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	0.7 /100 \| #242	Tragic 44.5%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	0.7 /100 \| #243	Tragic 44.5%
Japanese	0.6 /100 \| #244	Tragic 44.5%
Immigrants \| Armenia	0.4 /100 \| #245	Tragic 44.3%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.4 /100 \| #246	Tragic 44.3%
Ugandans	0.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 44.2%
Nicaraguans	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 44.2%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 44.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 44.2%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married

In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Currently Married
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	52.4 /100 \| #171	Average 46.7%
Aleuts	52.0 /100 \| #172	Average 46.7%
Tlingit-Haida	51.2 /100 \| #173	Average 46.7%
Peruvians	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 46.6%
Immigrants \| Brazil	49.9 /100 \| #175	Average 46.6%
Hawaiians	48.6 /100 \| #176	Average 46.6%
Israelis	48.6 /100 \| #177	Average 46.6%
Chickasaw	47.8 /100 \| #178	Average 46.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	44.6 /100 \| #179	Average 46.5%
Costa Ricans	43.7 /100 \| #180	Average 46.5%
Ottawa	43.0 /100 \| #181	Average 46.5%
Potawatomi	41.9 /100 \| #182	Average 46.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	39.7 /100 \| #183	Fair 46.5%
Brazilians	39.3 /100 \| #184	Fair 46.4%
Mongolians	37.6 /100 \| #185	Fair 46.4%