Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Uruguayans
Chickasaw
45.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
7.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,776,099 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 45.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 27.6% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 81.8% | 68.4% |
| Range | 54.2% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 51.8% | 48.9% |
| Median | 49.5% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.7% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.2% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Houma (45.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Marshallese (45.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Micronesia (45.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Alaska Native (45.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Dutch West Indian (45.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Taiwanese | 11.7 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 11.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.8% |
| South American Indians | 11.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 45.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 11.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 45.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 10.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 45.7% |
| Alsatians | 10.8 /100 | #208 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 8.8 /100 | #209 | Tragic 45.6% |
| Uruguayans | 7.9 /100 | #210 | Tragic 45.6% |
| Houma | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 45.5% |
| Marshallese | 7.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 45.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 7.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 45.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 45.5% |
| German Russians | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 45.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 45.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 45.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |