Immigrants from Ghana vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Chickasaw
42.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,931,543 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230 and weighted average of 42.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 9.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 23.3% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 68.3% | 68.4% |
Range | 45.0% | 40.9% |
Mean | 44.4% | 48.9% |
Median | 44.5% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.9% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.7% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Native/Alaskan (42.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Subsaharan African (42.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |