Ute vs Maltese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Maltese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ute
Maltese
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Maltese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,465,300 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.51%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 15.2% |
| Range | 24.8% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 6.6% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Maltese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |