U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Chickasaw
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,522,963 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 58.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 17.9% | 21.2% |
| Range | 17.7% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Yemen (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Guatemalan (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |