Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Chickasaw
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,732,772 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 65.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 4.9% | 21.2% |
| Range | 4.5% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.89% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |