Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Chickasaw
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,393,867 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 62.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 21.2% |
| Range | 8.4% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Iran (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Armenia (2.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Somali (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |