U.S. Virgin Islander vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Spanish American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Spanish American Indians
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,522,963 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,148,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 9.1%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 0.26% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 17.9% | 8.6% |
Range | 17.7% | 7.1% |
Mean | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 4.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Yemen (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Guatemalan (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |