Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Nicaraguans
Chickasaw
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,654,753 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 64.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 21.2% |
| Range | 7.6% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.5% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Central American (2.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Afghan (2.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |