Nepalese vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Nepalese
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Nepalese
Chickasaw
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,517,800 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 35.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 6.3% | 21.2% |
Range | 3.9% | 18.8% |
Mean | 3.5% | 7.4% |
Median | 3.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.92% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.91% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Nepalese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Netherlands (3.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Samoan (3.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Yugoslavian (3.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (3.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | England | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |