U.S. Virgin Islander vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Natives/Alaskans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,522,963 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 49.0%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 0.26% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 17.9% | 13.7% |
Range | 17.7% | 11.7% |
Mean | 3.5% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Yemen (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Cypriot (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Guatemalan (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |