Immigrants from Brazil vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Chickasaw
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 55.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.070% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 21.2% |
| Range | 9.7% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |