Immigrants from France vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from France
Chickasaw
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,858,802 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 53.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from France | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.48% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 19.7% | 21.2% |
| Range | 19.2% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |