Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,605,800 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 60.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.97% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 7.9% | 21.2% |
| Range | 6.9% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Honduras (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Somalia (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |