Immigrants from Western Africa vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Africa
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Africa
Chickasaw
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Africa vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,657,073 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 71.2%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.19% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 21.2% |
Range | 11.7% | 18.8% |
Mean | 2.7% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Okinawan (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Salvadoran (2.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from China (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (2.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Haitians | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.6% |
West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |