Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Chickasaw
2.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,188,332 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 104.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.37% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 6.8% | 21.2% |
Range | 6.4% | 18.8% |
Mean | 2.5% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.3%, a difference of 2.9%), Guyanese (2.3%, a difference of 4.3%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.3%, a difference of 5.8%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and Vietnamese (2.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guyanese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |