Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chickasaw
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,695,899 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 62.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 8.1% | 21.2% |
| Range | 7.9% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Iranian (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |