Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Chickasaw
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,775,965 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 61.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 12.4% | 21.2% |
| Range | 11.2% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.1% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Israeli (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Iranian (2.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |