Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
16.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,288 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 44.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 21.2% |
| Range | 12.8% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |