Immigrants from Oceania vs Northern European Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Northern European
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Northern Europeans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
45.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
50.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Northern European Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,325,142 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,711,615 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.31%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Northern European |
| Minimum | 0.72% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 20.2% | 18.1% |
| Range | 19.5% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.8% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Northern Europeans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Scandinavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |