Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Brazilian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Brazilians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
45.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,325,142 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,719,841 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Brazilian |
Minimum | 0.72% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 8.2% |
Range | 19.5% | 7.7% |
Mean | 3.5% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |