Immigrants from Oceania vs Native Hawaiian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Native Hawaiian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Native Hawaiians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
45.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
33.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Native Hawaiian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,325,142 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,807,196 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.78%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 0.72% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 7.3% |
Range | 19.5% | 6.3% |
Mean | 3.5% | 2.7% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Native Hawaiians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Guyanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |