Immigrants from Oceania vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,645,085 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,741,531 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 19.8%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Chickasaw
Minimum	1.3%	2.2%
Maximum	16.3%	100.0%
Range	15.0%	97.8%
Mean	8.1%	31.1%
Median	7.6%	16.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.9%	8.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.1%	50.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.2%	41.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.8%	28.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.7%	28.5%

Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Jordan (7.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (7.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (7.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (7.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Colombian (7.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Scandinavians	83.0 /100 \| #140	Excellent 7.4%
Greeks	82.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Argentina	81.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 7.5%
Koreans	81.3 /100 \| #143	Excellent 7.5%
Europeans	79.1 /100 \| #144	Good 7.5%
Immigrants \| Jordan	78.9 /100 \| #145	Good 7.5%
Japanese	78.9 /100 \| #146	Good 7.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.4 /100 \| #147	Good 7.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	77.3 /100 \| #148	Good 7.5%
Colombians	76.1 /100 \| #149	Good 7.5%
Aleuts	76.0 /100 \| #150	Good 7.5%
Immigrants \| Peru	74.9 /100 \| #151	Good 7.5%
Bangladeshis	74.8 /100 \| #152	Good 7.5%
Uruguayans	74.7 /100 \| #153	Good 7.5%
Northern Europeans	74.3 /100 \| #154	Good 7.5%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Creek (8.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Jamaica (8.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Tlingit-Haida (8.9%, a difference of 0.83%), Hispanic or Latino (9.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from West Indies (9.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 8.8%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 8.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 8.9%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 8.9%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 8.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 8.9%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 8.9%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 9.0%
Hispanics or Latinos	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 9.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 9.0%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 9.1%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 9.1%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 9.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 9.1%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 9.1%