Immigrants from Oceania vs Hungarian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Hungarian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Hungarians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
45.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Hungarian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,325,142 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,432,648 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 20.2% | 16.4% |
| Range | 19.5% | 15.9% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Hungarians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Iraqi (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Austrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
| Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |