Yakama vs Creek Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Creek
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Creek
15.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Creek Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,068,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,159,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 5.7%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Creek |
Minimum | 5.7% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 52.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.7% | 96.0% |
Mean | 20.7% | 25.8% |
Median | 21.2% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 33.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Creek by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.77%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |