Russian vs Czech Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Russian
Czech
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Russians
Czechs
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Czech Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,911,881 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,035,895 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Czech |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 47.5% | 59.4% |
| Range | 45.0% | 59.0% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 13.9% |
| Median | 10.8% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Czechs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |