Osage vs Lumbee Male Disability
COMPARE
Osage
Lumbee
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Osage
Lumbee
14.0%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Lumbee Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,798,879 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,279,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 8.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 37.7% | 38.1% |
| Range | 29.7% | 35.8% |
| Mean | 19.3% | 18.5% |
| Median | 17.4% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Lumbee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Apache (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Comanche (14.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Ottawa (14.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Shoshone (13.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |