Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,336,154 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 64.5 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $86,109, a difference of 13.7%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $79,103, a difference of 13.1%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $41,986, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $59,248, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $38,511, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.62%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.2%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).