Immigrants from Latvia vs Australian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Australian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Australians
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Australian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,493 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,103,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Australian |
Minimum | 0.16% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 21.9% |
Range | 17.0% | 21.4% |
Mean | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Australians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |