Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Kenya Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,832,937 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Immigrants from Kenya. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 89.5 Immigrants from Kenya.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $42,661, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $90,767, a difference of 23.6%), and median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $53,427, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $49,633, a difference of 12.7%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $39,535, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.94%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 0.80%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.8%).