Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,477,508 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.3%), per capita income ($53,359 compared to $55,082, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $54,830, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $69,703, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $112,575, a difference of 0.31%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,498 compared to $118,932, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.12%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.9%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.24%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and family households (63.4% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.2%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and female disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).