Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,077,327 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.265% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 264.9 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $101,091, a difference of 6.2%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $47,489, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $42,304, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $56,168, a difference of 0.76%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $62,939, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (48.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 70.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.84%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%).