Celtic vs Jordanian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Celtic
Jordanian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Celtics
Jordanians
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Jordanian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,703,210 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,482 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 5.6%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Jordanian |
Minimum | 0.51% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 21.5% | 13.9% |
Range | 21.0% | 12.5% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Jordanians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Mexico (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Polish (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |