Bolivian vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Bolivian
Burmese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Bolivians
Burmese
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,491,502 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,977,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.42% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 60.4% | 41.5% |
| Range | 60.0% | 40.3% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 10.9% |
| Median | 11.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Burmese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |