Bolivian vs Burmese Disability
COMPARE
Bolivian
Burmese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Bolivians
Burmese
10.0%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Burmese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,660,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,330,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 3.7%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 37.1% |
| Range | 21.8% | 36.1% |
| Mean | 9.8% | 9.7% |
| Median | 9.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Burmese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from China (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Iranian (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Pakistan (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (10.4%, a difference of 0.70%), Asian (10.4%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and Immigrants from Iran (10.3%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.5% |