U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,722,962 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $77,465, a difference of 48.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $116,156, a difference of 40.4%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $98,496, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.8%), median earnings ($41,448 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.8%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 85.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 66.8%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 90.6%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 87.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 55.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.88%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.44%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%).