Immigrants from Denmark vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,506,113 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $46,098, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $56,872, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $77,465, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($98,510 compared to $98,496, a difference of 0.010%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,000 compared to $116,156, a difference of 0.13%), and median family income ($120,445 compared to $116,188, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and single female poverty (20.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.8%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.1%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.0%).