Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Chinese

Good
Exceptional
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,701,824 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.658% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 658.3 Chinese.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $77,465, a difference of 17.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.1%), and per capita income ($52,217 compared to $46,098, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,847 compared to $116,188, a difference of 0.29%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $104,264, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.7%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.8%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.41%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.6%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayChinese
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%