Sioux vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,344,727 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.240% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 239.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $77,465, a difference of 47.5%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $98,496, a difference of 45.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,750 compared to $116,156, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($39,448 compared to $48,836, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (15.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 143.7%), married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 138.5%), and male poverty (18.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 115.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (23.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 55.0%), single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 57.5%), and receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 72.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 95.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 91.7%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.7%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.3%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.52 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.2%), family households (64.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.5%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%).