Finnish vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,573,725 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.1%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.9%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $46,098, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 68.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.8%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%), bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and associate's degree (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%).