European vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Europeans

Chinese

Good
Exceptional
8,117
SOCIAL INDEX
78.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
87th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in European Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,740,021 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to an increase of 30.9 Chinese.
European Integration in Chinese Communities

European vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,779 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.5%), wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,836 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.57%), median male earnings ($57,637 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($47,915 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.9%).
European vs Chinese Income
Income MetricEuropeanChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,836
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,099
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,751
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,915
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,637
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,457
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,310
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,367
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,779
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Average
25.9%

European vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
European vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricEuropeanChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.8%

European vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 63.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
European vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEuropeanChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

European vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
European vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEuropeanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

European vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (49.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
European vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEuropeanChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Excellent
30.2%

European vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.6%), no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
European vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEuropeanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

European vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.1%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
European vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricEuropeanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.8%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
1.8%

European vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
European vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricEuropeanChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%