Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,425,628 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $56,872, a difference of 17.6%), per capita income ($53,806 compared to $46,098, a difference of 16.7%), and median earnings ($56,183 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $58,162, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $116,156, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.8%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (48.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 64.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.9%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.4%), and professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 37.7%), male disability (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.6%).