Colville vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Colville
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Colville
Chinese
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Colville Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,989,907 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.478% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to an increase of 478.4 Chinese.
Colville vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,739 compared to $77,465, a difference of 49.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $116,156, a difference of 40.8%), and median household income ($70,094 compared to $98,496, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $41,461, a difference of 10.5%), median earnings ($42,151 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,774 compared to $58,162, a difference of 16.9%).
Income Metric | Colville | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,047 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,792 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,094 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,151 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,516 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,514 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,774 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,604 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,474 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,739 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.3% | Average 25.9% |
Colville vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (24.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 103.1%), family poverty (13.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 99.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (25.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 96.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (21.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 38.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother poverty (39.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 59.6%).
Poverty Metric | Colville | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 29.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 39.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Colville vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 84.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Colville | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Colville vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Colville | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Colville vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.89%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (63.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Colville | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 45.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Colville vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 66.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Colville | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Colville vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 32.6%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.3%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Colville | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Colville vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 187.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 53.8%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (55.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 13.6%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.1%).
Disability Metric | Colville | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |