Austrian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,929,976 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to a decrease of 27.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($49,501 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $104,264, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.7%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.53%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%).