Vietnamese vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Vietnamese

Chinese

Fair
Exceptional
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Vietnamese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,079,509 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Vietnamese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Vietnamese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Vietnamese corresponds to a decrease of 16.1 Chinese.
Vietnamese Integration in Chinese Communities

Vietnamese vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,143 compared to $77,465, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,788 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.8%), and wage/income gap (21.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,377 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,127 compared to $58,162, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($46,172 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.8%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Income
Income MetricVietnameseChinese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,368
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,123
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,248
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Average
$46,172
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,525
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,377
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,127
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,089
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,788
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,143
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.0%
Average
25.9%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.4%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricVietnameseChinese
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.8%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricVietnameseChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricVietnameseChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricVietnameseChinese
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 219.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 128.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 91.7%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricVietnameseChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
8.8%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 115.6%), college, under 1 year (61.7% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and college, 1 year or more (57.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricVietnameseChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.0%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.9%
Fair
1.8%

Vietnamese vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 54.1%), disability age under 5 (0.81% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vietnamese vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricVietnameseChinese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.81%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%