Apache vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Apache
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Apache
Chinese
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Apache Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,943,549 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 92.0 Chinese.
Apache vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $77,465, a difference of 41.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $116,156, a difference of 41.3%), and median household income ($70,927 compared to $98,496, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $58,162, a difference of 17.7%), and median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | Apache | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,886 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,451 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,927 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,388 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,429 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,895 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,395 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,260 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,184 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,668 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.5% | Average 25.9% |
Apache vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 145.5%), family poverty (14.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 126.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (24.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 106.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 48.6%), single father poverty (24.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 62.9%).
Poverty Metric | Apache | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Apache vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 95.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 81.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Apache | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Apache vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Apache | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.2% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Apache vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.46 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Apache | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.46 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Apache vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Apache | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Apache vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.7%), bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and associate's degree (36.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Apache | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.2% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Apache vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 78.2%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and female disability (13.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.1%).
Disability Metric | Apache | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 53.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |