Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,838,079 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.332% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 332.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,913 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.16%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%).